Letters of Sri Aurobindo
Volume 3. 1936-37
Fragment ID: 18695
It is said that normally one passes from the impersonal to the personal aspect of the realisation. But at present I have both the aspects. The personal was there from the beginning and the impersonal came by itself. So what is the truth of the matter?
There is no truth of the matter. One can pass from personal to impersonal or from impersonal to the personal or get the impersonal upon the personal or the personal upon the impersonal or both together. Why want to make fixed rules about everything?
There are two different things,
(1) The liberated soul.
(2) The sadhak who has surrendered his actions to God.
The liberated soul is necessarily above shastra. But the sadhak of liberation need not be unless he has surrendered his actions to God.
Quite so! To live in the mind and vital and try to reach the Divine through them is religion at the most, it is not spirituality nor Yoga.
I have never seen that despondency brings down anything – at least here. It is supposed in Vaishnava Yoga to be effective in that way – sometimes, or at least to be a natural movement or recurring phase of the sadhana. It certainly seems to be the latter with many sadhaks here but I think the sadhana is better without it.
Anyhow chaos means an anarchy of disordered forces and the old theory was that out of such a chaos God created a world by imposing order and harmony on the forces.